The applicants argued that respondent No. 1 had now been given his because of share through the deceased’s estate all through his life time via a present (hiba), and thus wasn't entitled to even more share. Having said that, the applicants did not deliver any tangible proof demonstrating that respondent https://family-lawyer-in-dha-kara37395.shotblogs.com/helping-the-others-realize-the-advantages-of-corporate-lawyer-in-dha-46160675